Now that I'm at the end of the road, this thing about discussing the results come up... I've no idea how to do that as I've not been able to reproduce complicated algorithms from other papers to compare an discuss it with... so i'm drawing blank here...
So "The discussion"- demonstrates your ability to think critically on an issue-develop creative solutions to problems based on a logical synthesis of the problem- formulate a deeper more profound understanding of the research problem under consideration
(Okay so, basically, I'm reinstating the problem statement in terms of the findings...)
Present the underlying meaning of your research, note possible implications in other areas of study, and explore possible improvements that can be made in order to further develop the concerns of your research.
(Okay, so i can write about that... there are tonnes of future work that needs to be done 'nywayz.
Highlight the importance of your study and how it may be able to contribute to and/or help fill existing gaps in the field. If appropriate, the discussion section is also where you state how the findings from your study revealed and helped fill gaps in the literature that had not been previously exposed or adequately described, and
Engage the reader in thinking critically about issues based upon an evidence-based interpretation of findings; it is not governed strictly by objective reporting of information.
(that might be a little tricky!) The rest of the article is pretty informative too... give a lot of pointers!!)
Just had a thought... it's difficult to be highly critical of your own work, so I'm just gonna take all those critical reviewer comments and put them in my paper 😁 best idea I've had so far!!
And they've given me lot's of things to discuss about to... like all those things that are not in the paper... the good bits, etc...
